France Is Blocking Sites That Promote Pedophilia And Cyber-Terrorism

The French government can get the blocking of Internet sites without judicial authorization in order. This measure, adopted within the Loppsi bill in the French Assembly and won the proposal despite their differences of some members of the majority. To prosecute child pornography sites or cyber criminals, the government provides a blacklist operators move to block access to the Internet in France. Its inefficiency and the danger that the blockade was extended to other sites for other reasons, particularly politica. The measure, to tackle access to websites in other countries, has been criticized by opponents of the same two reasons.
Members who are opposed to this book argues that the resources of cybercrime is very important and not slow local blocking of Internet sites. The real cure is to achieve international action to close the server in the country where they are housed. In addition, the experience of blacklists in other countries such as Australia, have shown that its development of very complex and ultimately impact on sites that will have nothing to do with pedophilia and cyber crime. In Australia it was the personal blog of a dental block. Other concerns that all this is done without judicial review.
The same right to seize in another article, a penalty of two years imprisonment and fines for those who want an Internet identity.
Google Rate
In contrast, in the budget debate postponed six months after entry into force of a tax on Internet advertising. The government, faced with an avalanche of criticism, has postponed the implementation of further negotiations. Google Rate misnamed, because they sought to collect the tax on the promotional activities of companies based in another country and thus get out of the French Treasury, the solution is perverse. received instead of taxing companies, the advertising companies in France, commissioned him, according to a statement of the companies, leading to a paradox: the competitiveness of local firms and allow immune damage to multinational companies in another country.